Marriage Strike Persuasion Tip

 

To encourage more men to join the marriage strike or to explain and defend the marriage strike, one need not assert that marriage benefits women. (“Women get prizes for marrying, men don’t!”)

It’s enough to say things like:

-Marriage sucks for men.

-There’s no good reason for most men to enter that terrible state contract.

-Marriage brings nothing a man wants he can’t otherwise get for less cost.

None of those statements mention women or what marriage does for women.

A woman (or a man, for that matter) arguing that marriage sucks for women, too, is not your opponent. At least not while they are arguing that point, if your goal is for fewer men to marry. The fewer women who marry, the fewer men who marry.

I concede that if your higher goal is changing family law in hopes of ending the marriage strike, you might want more women to want marriage but be unable to find a willing man, so that they might vote accordingly. But you may be counting on the women’s vote to be more rational and thought-out than it is.

As for me, I accept things are they are now, and as such, my goal is simply for fewer men to suffer in a terrible state contract and a bad social construct.