Showing posts with label Susie Young Kim. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Susie Young Kim. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

What is Wrong With This Picture?

It's another bright and sunny day in Santa Ana, California. Denisse Salazar of the Orange County Register has this article of interest.

Susie Young Kim, 37, was shot and killed just after 1 a.m. April 10 at 17th Street and Grand Avenue near a Food 4 Less supermarket in Santa Ana after a 30-minute [high speed] pursuit through Buena Park, Anaheim, Fullerton and Santa Ana.
That saved us the expense of having her go through the court and correctional systems, right? Well, keep reading.

Kim's 13-month-old daughter, who was in a car seat in the back seat of the black Toyota sedan she was driving, was unharmed. She was taken to Orangewood Children's Home and then placed under the care of her grandparents and father.
Thank God. How evil of her to put her child in that situation.

But guess what? Susie Young Kim's parents have filed a claim against the city!

The claim was filed June 24 by attorney Dale K. Galipo on behalf of Kim's parents, Yung Kim and Nancy Kim, and on behalf of her daughter, Angelica Kim Contreras, and the estate of Susie Young Kim.
That's what we call nerve. Audacity.

The claim asks for $20 million in damages, including for funeral expenses, legal costs, severe emotional distress, survival and punitive damages.
And what about Susie Young Kim's responsibility in all of this?

The claim alleges that the Santa Ana Police Department's officers involved in the incident "used excessive deadly force, which resulted in the death of Susie Young Kim."
Why have the officers never used excessive force against me? Oh, that's right. Because I don't put myself in that position. I don't drive like a maniac and refuse to pull over.

It goes on to say that the officers involved also "knowingly endangered the passenger child by using unnecessary deadly force and negligently handling the vehicle pursuit."
Susie Young Kim endangered the child, if the newspaper has it right.

Galipo said that based on his independent investigation to date, the officer fired from the side and there were no bullet holes to the front of the windshield.
Which might have been what spared the child.

After the incident, Buena Park police Sgt. Bill Kohanek said officers saw a car seat in the back seat and broadcast that over police radio, but he also said it's not uncommon for officers to miss transmissions.
I've driven many times with a car seat that didn't have a child in it. Especially at 1am.

Santa Ana has 45 days to respond to the claim. After that, a lawsuit can be filed. Galipo said they intend to file a lawsuit unless the city wants to reach a settlement.
Ka-ching!!! Blood money.

Galipo said it's unclear why Kim did not immediately stop when a Buena Park police officer tried to pull her over.
Oh, of course it is. I'm sure she had a perfectly good reason not to stop. Everyone does that with a 13-month-old in the car. At 1am.

I'm so sick of people who commit crimes (or the people who raised them) getting seven figure paydays at taxpayer expense.

Hey Yung Kim and Nancy Kim – how about a formal public apology for the actions of your daughter? You know, some day, that child is going to find out what her mother did. Poor thing... that child is the real victim in all of this, and her mother is mostly to blame, if the newspaper's report has it right.